GIANNONE v. GIANNONE
MEMORANDUM AND/OR OPINION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 3/22/17. 3/22/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOSEPH GIANNONE, SENIOR and
JOSEPH GIANNONE, INC., t/a JOSEPH
GIANNONE PLUMBING & HEATING,
JOSEPH GIANNONE, JUNIOR and
JOSEPH GIANNONE HEATING & AIR
CONDITIONING, INC., t/a JOSEPH
GIANNONE PLUMBING ▪ HEATING ▪ AIR
March 22, 2017
Before me now is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and
Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Because Defendants’ Motion to
Dismiss is extremely untimely, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike is granted.
This case began on February 25, 2016, when Plaintiffs Joseph Giannone, Sr. and Joseph
Giannone, Inc. filed their original Complaint. At that time, the case was assigned to Judge Anita
B. Brody. Judge Brody referred the matter to a Magistrate Judge for mediation and entered an
Order on April 11 staying all deadlines. When mediation failed to produce a settlement,
Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint on October 26. Two days later, the case was reassigned
from Judge Brody to me. On December 12, I lifted Judge Brody’s stay. On March 13, 2017,
Defendants, Joseph Giannone, Jr. and Joseph Giannone Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc., filed
a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6)—their first response to Plaintiffs’ claims. This Motion
was either 69 days late or 116 days late, depending on whether the clock for a 12(b)(6) Motion
began running when I lifted Judge Brody’s stay in mid-December or when the Amended
Complaint was filed in late October. In either case, the Motion to Dismiss was clearly late. On
this basis, Plaintiffs moves to strike Defendants’ Motion.
When a party fails to answer or otherwise plead within 21 days of service of the
complaint, the court has discretion to allow or bar an untimely response in the absence of a
motion for default judgment. Kampf v. Heinecke, No. CIV. A. 94-6452, 1995 WL 262526, at *1
(E.D. Pa. Apr. 28, 1995); see also McGehean v. AF & L Ins. Co., No. CIV.A. 09-CV-01792-T,
2009 WL 3172763, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 2, 2009) (same). Exercising this discretion, I find that
the extreme and unexplained tardiness of Defendants’ Motion weighs heavily in favor of
granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Strike. Defendants shall file an answer to Plaintiffs’ Amended
Complaint within 14 days. Pursuant to Rule 12, Defendants’ remain free to assert the defenses
advanced in their 12(b)(6) motion at the appropriate time later in the case. An Order follows.
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?