GATTER v. IKA-WORKS, INC.
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. THE MOTION IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S RETALIATION CLAIMS, AND DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFF'S DISPARATE TREATMENT AND HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT CLAIMS.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 12/16/2016. 12/19/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AND NOW, this 16th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of Defendant’s
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 34); Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition thereto (ECF
No. 36); and Plaintiff’s Reply in Support thereof (ECF No. 40), after oral argument and for the
reasons stated in the Court’s Opinion of December 16, 2016 (ECF No. 44), IT IS ORDERED
that Defendant’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:
(1) The motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s retaliation claims; and
(2) The motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s disparate treatment and hostile
work environment claims.
BY THE COURT:
/S/WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?