ALESSANDRINI et al v. GWYNEDD CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION et al

Filing 18

OPINION/ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. #12), SEEKING DISMISSAL OF COUNTS II AND III, IS GRANTED, AND COUNTS II AND III ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO REFER THIS CASE TO BANKRUPTCY COURT (DO C. #8), IS GRANTED, AND THE REMAINDER OF THE CASE (COUNT I) IS REFERRED TO THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH OTHER PROCEEDINGS UNDER PLAINTIFF'S/DEBTOR'S BANKRUPTCY CASE NUMBER 15-13658. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR A RULE 16 CONFERENCE IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 12/19/16. 12/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTINE DENISE ALESSANDRINI, Plaintiff, v. GWYNEDD CLUB CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION; MID-ATLANTIC MANAGEMENT CORPORATION; CAROL PAOTE, President of Gwynedd Club Condominium Association Executive Board; and JOHN BITTNER, Secretary of Gwynedd Club Condominium Association Executive Board, Defendants. ORDER CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-0968 AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to Refer this Case to Bankruptcy Court (Doc. #8), Defendants’ Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. #12), Plaintiff’s Request for Rule 16 Conference, and all supporting and opposing papers, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. #12), seeking dismissal of Counts II and III, is GRANTED, and Counts II and III are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 2. Plaintiff’s Motion to Refer this Case to Bankruptcy Court (Doc. #8), is GRANTED, and the remainder of the case (Count I) is referred to the bankruptcy court to be consolidated with other proceedings under Plaintiff’s/Debtor’s bankruptcy case number 15-13658. 3. Plaintiff’s Request for a Rule 16 Conference is DENIED AS MOOT. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?