CREWS v. RESNICK et al

Filing 15

OPINION/ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 13) IS GRANTED AND THIS ACTION IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION UNDER RULE 41(b) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS MATTER AS CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDWARD G. SMITH ON 4/4/17. 4/4/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE' AND E-MAILED.(ky, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL CREWS, : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER MICHAEL RESNICK, MAYOR NUTTER, and MAYOR KENNEY, Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-978 ORDER AND NOW, this 4th day of April, 2017, after considering the motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution filed by the defendants, Commissioner Michael Resnick, Mayor Nutter, and Mayor Kenney (Doc. No. 13); and for the reasons set forth in the separately-filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 13) is GRANTED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for lack of prosecution under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and 2. The clerk of court shall mark this matter as CLOSED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Edward G. Smith EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?