NINEVEH INVESTMENTS LIMITED v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR APPLICATION OF FOREIGN LAW (DOC. NO. 37 ), IS DENIED. PENNSYLVANIA LAW WILL BE APPLIED IN THIS CASE. THE CASE SHALL PROCEED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SCHEDULING ORDER DATED 6/14/2017, WITH ONE CORRECTION - PARAGRAPH 4 OF THAT ORDER IS CORRECTED TO STATE THAT PLAINTIFF SHALL FILE AND SERVE A MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BOTH PARTIES SHALL FILE AND SERVE DAUBERT MOTIONS ON OR BEFORE 7/20/2018, NOT 7/20/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 12/4/2017.12/5/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
NINEVEH INVESTMENTS LIMITED,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
AND NOW, this 4th day of December, 2017, upon consideration of plaintiff’s Motion
for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 (Doc. No. 37),
the United States’ Opposition to Nineveh’s Motion for Application of Foreign Law (Doc. No.
38), plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Motion for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 (Doc. No. 40), and the United States’ Sur-Reply in Opposition to
Nineveh’s Motion for Application of Foreign Law (Doc. No. 43), for the reasons stated in the
accompanying Memorandum dated December 4, 2017, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion
for Application of Foreign Law Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 44.1 is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Pennsylvania law will be applied in this case.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the case shall proceed in accordance with the
Scheduling Order dated June 14, 2017, with one correction—Paragraph 4 of that Order is
corrected to state that plaintiff shall file and serve a motion for summary judgment and both
parties shall file and serve Daubert motions on or before July 20, 2018, not July 20, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?