WILLIAMS v. CARUSO

Filing 35

ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION (DOC. NO. 12) IS GRANTED. PLFF'S CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED PLFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE (DOC. NOS. 18, 19, AND 20) AND DEFT'S MOTION IN LIMINE (DOC. NO. 22) ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 2/9/17. 2/10/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL, 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN. (pr, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JALIL WILLIAMS
v.
JOSEPH CARUSO

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 16-1134

ORDER
AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Joseph
Caruso’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff Jalil Williams’s response thereto, and
following a November 17, 2016, oral argument, and for the reasons set forth in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant’s Motion (Document 12) is
GRANTED. Plaintiff’s claims are DISMISSED without prejudice under Heck v Humphrey, 512
U.S. 477 (1994).
It is further ORDERED Plaintiff’s Motions in Limine (Documents 18, 19, and 20) and
Defendant’s Motion in Limine (Document 22) are DISMISSED as moot.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, J.

.