DIGENOVA v. UNITE HERE LOCAL 274 et al

Filing 8

MEMORANDUM ORDER THAT THE MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. NO. 4 ), IS GRANTED AND THE COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES IS DENIED. 6/6/2016 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE AND E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOSEPH DIGENOVA, Plaintiff, vs. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1222 UNITE HERE LOCAL 274, ET AL., Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2016, upon consideration of the defendants UNITE HERE Local 274’s and Mike Mullins’ (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss (ECF 4), and the plaintiff Joseph DiGenova’s response thereto (ECF 5), it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED. The Complaint (ECF 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants request for attorneys’ fees is DENIED. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 16\16-1222 DiGenova v UNITE HERE Local 274\Order re Motion to Dismiss.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?