BOWEN v. DB SCHENKER

Filing 19

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT 7 , PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION 13 , DEFENDANT'S REPLY 14 , AND FOR THE REASONS IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM, IT IS ORDERED DEFENDANT'S MOTION 7 IS GRA NTED AS PLAINTIFF HAS NOT STATED CLAIMS FOR MISAPPROPRIATION OF IDEAS, UNJUST ENRICHMENT OR QUANTUM MERUIT UNDER PENNSYLVANIA LAW THE CLERK SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 7/25/16. 7/25/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(gs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JERRA V. BOWDEN CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 16-1272 DB SCHENKER ORDER AND NOW, this 25th day of July 2016, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 7), Plaintiff's Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 13), Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 14), following extensive oral argument, and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 7) is GRANTED as Plaintiff has not stated claims for misappropriation of ideas, unjust enrichment or quantum meruit under Pennsylvania Law. The Clerk of Court shall close this case.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?