IMPALA PLATINUM HOLDINGS LIMITED et al v. A-1 SPECIALZED SERVICES & SUPPLIES, INC. et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS UNDER RICO, COUNT VI OF THE AMENDED COMPLAINT, ARE GRANTED AND THE RICO CLAIMS ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. IN ADDITION, THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 209 AND 210 ARE DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 3/3/17. 3/3/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(gs)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IMPALA PLATINUM HOLDINGS
LIMITED, et al.
A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES AND
SUPPLIES, INC., et al.
ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND NOW, this 3rd day of March, 2017, after extensive briefing and oral argument on
February 27, 2017, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED
that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiffs’ claims under the Racketeer
Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (“RICO”), Count VI of the Amended Complaint, are
GRANTED and the RICO claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
In addition, the Motions for Summary Judgment of Slogam Limited Partnership (ECF
209) and Suresh K. Khosla (with Leena Khosla as Guardian) (ECF 210) are DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
MICHAEL M. BAYLSON
United States District Court Judge
O:\CIVIL 16\16-1343 Impala v. A-1\16cv1343 Order re SJ - RICO.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?