IMPALA PLATINUM HOLDINGS LIMITED et al v. A-1 SPECIALZED SERVICES & SUPPLIES, INC. et al

Filing 386

ORDER THAT COUNSEL FOR IMPALA AND KUMAR SHALL PROMPTLY DISCUSS THE POSTING OF SURETY BY KUMAR AS OUTLINED HEREIN. COUNSEL SHALL SUBMIT A JOINT PROPOSED ORDER, OR SEPARATE ORDERS, NO LATER THAN 5/23/2017.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 5/16/2017. 5/16/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED, E-MAILED.(kp, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IMPALA PLATINUM HOLDINGS LIMITED, et al. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-1343 v. A-1 SPECIALIZED SERVICES AND SUPPLIES, INC., et al. ORDER AND NOW this 16th day of May, 2017, based on the foregoing Memorandum re: Stay of Execution, the Court ORDERS: 1. Counsel for Impala and Kumar shall promptly discuss the posting of surety by Kumar. If Kumar does not agree to either the security suggested by Impala, or to post other assets, or a supersedeas bond valued at $13 million, the Court is likely to lift the stay of execution, which may entitle Impala to execute on the judgment entered based on the jury’s verdict, notwithstanding the pendency of post-trial motions. 2. Counsel shall submit a joint proposed order, or separate orders, no later than May 23, 2017. Further argument may held at the hearing now scheduled for May 24, 2017. The Court intends to rule promptly. In the meantime, neither party shall take any steps that might impact the rights of another party. BY THE COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson MICHAEL M. BAYLSON United States District Court Judge O:\CIVIL 16\16-1343 Impala v. A-1\Order on Memo re Stay of Execution.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?