TALBERT v. CORRECTIONAL DENTAL ASSOCIATES et al
ORDER THAT THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 63) IS DENIED AND DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 65) IS GRANTED AS THERE ARE NO GENERAL ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT ON ANY REMAINING LEGAL ISSUE AND WE MUST ENTER JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW FOR DEFENDANTS. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 7/31/17. 7/31/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED. (jpd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ASSOCIATES, et al
AND NOW, this 31st day of July 2017, upon considering Plaintiffs Motion for summary
judgment (ECF Doc. No. 63), Defendants' Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 64), Defendants' Motion
for summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 65), Plaintiffs Opposition (ECF Doc. No. 69), following
oral argument and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Plaintiffs
Motion (ECF Doc. No. 63) is DENIED and Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 65) is
GRANTED as there are no general issues of material fact on any remaining legal issue and we
The Clerk of Court shall close this case.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?