JOHNSON v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. 13) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. JOHNSON'S MOTION (DOC. 10) IS GRANTED. THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) FOR FURTHER REVIEW CONSISTENT WITH JUDGE SITARKSKI'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 6/26/17. 6/26/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHARLENE T. JOHNSON
NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 1
Commissioner of Social Security
AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff Charlene T.
Johnson’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Defendant’s response thereto, and after careful
review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski, to
which no objections have been filed, 2 it is ORDERED:
The Report and Recommendation (Document 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Johnson’s Motion (Document 10) is GRANTED; and
The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to
sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further review consistent with Judge
Sitarski’s Report and Recommendation.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez.
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
Nancy A. Berryhill became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security on January 23, 2017.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), Berryhill is substituted for Carolyn W. Colvin as
the Defendant in this case.
The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on May 31, 2017, together with
a Notice from the Clerk of Court advising the parties of their obligation to file any objections within
fourteen days after service thereof. See Local R. Civ. P. 72.1 IV(b) (“Any party may object to a
magistrate judge’s proposed findings, recommendations or report under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) . .
. within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof.”). As of today’s date, no
objections have been filed.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?