DOMAN v. HARRY et al
ORDER THAT CHIEF JUDGE CARACAPPA'S EXTENSIVE AND WELL-REASONED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF DO. NO. 12) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (ECF DO. NO. 1) IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/23/16. 12/23/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
RAYMOND S. DOMAN,
AND NOW, this 23rd day of December 2016, upon independent consideration of Mr.
Doman's pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1), the Report and
Recommendation of United States Chief Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (ECF Doc. No.
12), with no filed Objections, and finding no basis for habeas review of challenges to the state
court's jury instructions, sufficiency of evidence for the jury's verdict of guilt as to recklessly
endangering another person, and ineffectiveness of counsel in failing to challenge transfer of
venue, it is ORDERED:
Recommendation (ECF Doc. No. 12) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF Doc. No. 1) is DENIED with
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and,
The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?