ROSH v. THE GOLD STANDARD CAFE et al

Filing 17

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 12/19/16. 12/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNMY ROSH

:
:
v.
:
:
THE GOLD STANDARD CAFÉ AT PENN, INC., :
ET AL.
:

CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-1676

ORDER
AND NOW, this

19th

day of

December

, 2016, upon consideration of

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 14), and all documents submitted
in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part
and denied in part as follows:
1.

The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s Title VII claims against

individual Defendants Whittacre, Harman, and Brion (Counts I and II).
2.

The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Gold

Standard Café at Penn, Inc. (Counts I - IV) and Plaintiff’s PHRA claims against
individual Defendants Whittacre, Harman, and Brion (Counts III and IV).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

________________________
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.