ROSH v. THE GOLD STANDARD CAFE et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED BY HONORABLE R. BARCLAY SURRICK ON 12/19/16. 12/20/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
THE GOLD STANDARD CAFÉ AT PENN, INC., :
AND NOW, this
, 2016, upon consideration of
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 14), and all documents submitted
in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part
and denied in part as follows:
The Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s Title VII claims against
individual Defendants Whittacre, Harman, and Brion (Counts I and II).
The Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant Gold
Standard Café at Penn, Inc. (Counts I - IV) and Plaintiff’s PHRA claims against
individual Defendants Whittacre, Harman, and Brion (Counts III and IV).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT:
R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?