VAZQUEZ v. CARR AND DUFF, INC. et al
Filing
21
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT THURMOND PACE MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN ITS ENTIRETY. DEFENDANT CARR AND DUFF, INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. PLAINTIFF IS GRANTED LEAVE TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT WITHIN 14 DAYS OF THE FILING OF THIS ORDER; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 9/28/17. 9/28/17 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MIGUEL VAZQUES,
Plaintiff,
v.
CARR AND DUFF, INC. et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO.: 16-1727
ORDER
AND NOW, this 28th day of September, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint
(Dkt No. 1), Defendants’ respective Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (Dkt Nos. 15 and 16),
and Plaintiff’s Responses thereto (Dkt Nos. 17 and 18), it is hereby ordered as follows:
1.
Defendant Thurmond Pace’s Motion (Dkt No. 16) is GRANTED
in its entirety.
2.
Defendant Carr and Duff, Inc.’s Motion (Dkt No. 15) is
GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Defendant
Carr and Duff, Inc.’s Motion is GRANTED as it relates to
Counts I, III, IV, V, VI, and VIII of the Complaint, and is
DENIED as it relates to Counts II and VII of the Complaint.
3.
Plaintiff is granted leave to amend the Complaint within fourteen
(14) days of the filing of this Order.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ C. Darnell Jones, II
C. Darnell Jones, II
J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?