GONZALEZ v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTATE JUDGE ELIZABETH T. HEY DATED JUNE 13, 2017 IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND THE RELIEF REQUESTED IN THE COMPLAINT ARE GRANTED TO THE EXTENT THAT PLAIN TIFF SEEKS A REMAND TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION AND DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS AND THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE COMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IN ACCORDANCE AS OUTLINE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JAN E. DUBOIS ON 7/7/17. 7/10/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANDREA GONZALEZ, on behalf of a
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security
AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Request for Review,
the record in this case, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T.
Hey, dated June 13, 2017, no objections having been filed, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey,
dated June 13, 2017, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Plaintiff’s Request for Review and the relief requested in the Complaint are
GRANTED to the extent that plaintiff seeks a remand to the Commissioner of the Social Security
Administration and DENIED in all other respects; and,
The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in
accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Elizabeth T. Hey, dated June 13, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois
DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Nancy A. Berryhill became the Acting Commissioner of Social Security On January 21, 2017.
Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill is substituted for
Carolyn W. Colvin as the defendant in this suit.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?