BELL et al v. ABLE & SULLIVAN, LLC et al

Filing 12

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 8) IS DENIED AS TO ALL COUNTS OF THE COMPLAINT AS AGAINST ABLE & SULLIVAN, LLC. GRANTED AS TO CLAIMS AGAINST RHONDA SULLIVAN. ACCORDINGLY, COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT IF PLAINTIFF SECURES SUFFICIENT FACTS, WITHIN 30 DAYS. DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO STRIKE MATERIAL FROM COMPLAINT IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 9/13/16. 9/13/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TERESA BELL and NICHOLAS BELL, Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION v. ABLE & SULLIVAN, LLC and RHONDA SULLIVAN, Defendants. NO. 16-1851 ORDER AND NOW this 13th day of September, 2016, for the reasons stated in the foregoing Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF 8) is: 1. DENIED as to all Counts of the Complaint as against Able & Sullivan, LLC; 2. GRANTED as to claims against Rhonda Sullivan. Accordingly, the Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and with leave to file an Amended Complaint if Plaintiffs secure sufficient facts, within thirty (30) days. Defendants’ request to strike material from the Complaint is DENIED. BY THIS COURT: /s/ Michael M. Baylson MICHAEL M. BAYLSON United States District Court Judge O:\CIVIL 16\16-1851 Bell v. Able & Sullivan LLC\Order on Memo re MTD and Strike.docx

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?