STRADFORD et al v. WETZEL

Filing 90

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 75 IS DENIED. PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 77 IS GRANTED. JUDGMENT SHALL BE ENTERED BY SEPARATE ORDER; AND PLAINTIFFS SHALL SUBMIT A PROPOSED JUDGMENT WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS OF THIS ORDER. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 2/12/21. 2/12/21 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LACEY STRADFORD, et al.
v.
JOHN WETZEL,
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION
No. 16-2064

ORDER
AND NOW, this 12th day of February, 2021, upon consideration of Defendant John
Wetzel’s Motion for Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs Lacey Stradford, William Nettles, Jesse
Stroud, William Scott, and Richard Richardson’s Motion for Summary Judgment, the parties’
briefing on the Motions, and following a November 16, 2020, oral argument on the Motions, and
for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 75) is DENIED;
2. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Document 77) is GRANTED;
3. Judgment shall be entered by separate order; and
4. Plaintiffs shall submit a proposed judgment within five (5) days of this Order.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez
Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.