BROPHY v. COLVIN
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, ETC. THE COMMISSIONER'S DECISION DENYING PLAINTIFF'S CLAIM FOR BENEFITS IS REVERSED. THIS MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ETC. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL REMOVE THIS CASE FROM SUSPENSE AND MARK THE CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 05/18/2017. 05/19/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (nds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
MARIE ANN BROPHY,
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, ACTING
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 18th day of May, 2017, after reviewing
Plaintiff’s Request for Review of the decision of the
Commissioner of Social Security (ECF No. 9), the Commissioner's
response (ECF No. 12), the Plaintiff’s reply (ECF No. 14), and
the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Jacob P. Hart (ECF No. 16), there being no objections, it is
hereby ORDERED that:
The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and
Plaintiff’s Request for Review is GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part.
The Request for Review is GRANTED to the
extent that it seeks a reversal of the Commissioner’s decision
denying Plaintiff’s claim for benefits.
The Request for Review
is DENIED to the extent it seeks a determination by this Court
that Plaintiff is entitled to social security benefits;
The Commissioner’s decision denying Plaintiff’s
claim for benefits is REVERSED;
This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of
Social Security in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42
U.S.C. § 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the
Report and Recommendation; and
The Clerk of Court shall remove this case from
suspense and mark the case as CLOSED.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?