WALTHOUR v. HERRON et al
ORDER THAT THE PENDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS (ECF DOC NOS. 21 , 23 ) ARE GRANTED; THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (ECF DOC. NO. 18 ) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE; AND, HAVING FOUND MR. WALTHOUR IS CONTINUALLY ABUSI NG THE JUDICIAL PROCESS BY FILING MERITLESS AND REPETITIVE ACTIONS, ABSENT LEAVE GRANTED BY THIS COURT UPON MR. WALTHOUR'S SHOWING OF GOOD CAUSE BEFORE FILING ANOTHER ACTION, MR. WALTHOUR MAY NOT FILE FURTHER LAWSUITS BASED UPON HIS ALLEGATIONS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS NAMED IN THIS CASE RELATING TO THE MARCH 24, 2010 ORDER. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 9/22/16. 9/22/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED. (va, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
HERRON, et al.
AND NOW, this 22°d day of September 2016, upon consideration of the Honorable John
W. Herron's Motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 21), Plaintiffs Response (ECF Doc. No. 24),
Defendant Paul Feldman's Motion to dismiss (ECF Doc. No. 23), independent review of the
Amended Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and for reasons in the accompanying
Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
The pending Motions to dismiss (ECF Doc Nos. 21, 23) are GRANTED;
The Amended Complaint (ECF Doc. No. 18) is DISMISSED with prejudice and
the Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case; and,
Having found Mr. Walthour is continually abusing the judicial process by filing
meritless and repetitive actions, absent leave granted by this Court upon Mr. Walthour's showing
of good cause before filing another action, Mr. Walthour may not file further lawsuits based
upon his allegations against the Defendants named in this case relating to the March 24, 2010
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?