BEY v. RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
Filing
28
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 20) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. NO. 19) IS DENIED; DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM (DOC NO. 3) IS DEEMED MOOT; AND THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR ALL PURPOSES INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 2/16/2017. 2/17/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sme, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DARLEMA BEY,
Petitioner,
v.
RELIANCE STANDARD LIFE
INSURANCE COMPANY,
Respondents.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 16-2326
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of February, 2017, upon consideration of the Defendant’s
Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc. No. 3), Defendant’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (Doc. No. 20), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19), responses
thereto, and oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED:
1.
Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 20) is GRANTED;
2.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) is DENIED;
3.
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Doc No. 3) is
DEEMED MOOT.
4.
The Clerk of Court shall close this case for all purposes including statistics.
BY THE COURT:
_S/Gene E.K. Pratter______
GENE E.K. PRATTER
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?