POLT et al v. SANDOZ, INC.
Filing
130
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT 119 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 04/25/2019. 04/26/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CAROLINE POLT and MONICA POLT,
individually and as coexecutors of the estate
of JOANNE POLT, deceased,
Plaintiffs,
v.
SANDOZ, INC.,
Defendant.
: CIVIL ACTION
: NO. 16-02362
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
O R D E R
AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2019, upon
consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a
Supplemental Expert Report (ECF No. 119), it is hereby ORDERED
as follows:
1)
Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental
Expert Report (ECF No. 119) is GRANTED-IN-PART and
DENIED-IN-PART.
2)
Defendant may offer a rebuttal report limited in scope
to the addendum to Dr. Sharlin’s report by no later
than May 10, 2019.
Defendant may re-depose Dr.
Sharlin as to the addendum, and Plaintiffs may depose
an expert who offers a rebuttal report concerning the
addendum.
3)
Plaintiffs may submit an expert report limited in
scope to the 45 documents produced by Defendant
(bearing Bates numbers SANDOZ-AMIO-PBR3-010178 to
SANDOZ-AMIO-PBR3-013671 and FUTURESCRIPTS00001 to
FUTURESCRIPTS00005) by no later than May 10, 2019.1
Defendant may file a rebuttal report by no later than
May 24, 2019.
The parties may depose the experts who
submit such reports.
4)
All expert discovery shall be completed by no later
than June 28, 2019.
5)
All other deadlines in the Fifth Scheduling Order (ECF
No. 117) shall remain in place.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO,
J.
See ECF No. 119-1. If Plaintiffs submit such a
report, Plaintiffs must heed the directions stated in Section
III.B of the memorandum accompanying this Order.
1
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?