POLT et al v. SANDOZ, INC.

Filing 130

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL EXPERT REPORT 119 IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 04/25/2019. 04/26/2019 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CAROLINE POLT and MONICA POLT, individually and as coexecutors of the estate of JOANNE POLT, deceased, Plaintiffs, v. SANDOZ, INC., Defendant. : CIVIL ACTION : NO. 16-02362 : : : : : : : : : : O R D E R AND NOW, this 25th day of April, 2019, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Expert Report (ECF No. 119), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Expert Report (ECF No. 119) is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. 2) Defendant may offer a rebuttal report limited in scope to the addendum to Dr. Sharlin’s report by no later than May 10, 2019. Defendant may re-depose Dr. Sharlin as to the addendum, and Plaintiffs may depose an expert who offers a rebuttal report concerning the addendum. 3) Plaintiffs may submit an expert report limited in scope to the 45 documents produced by Defendant (bearing Bates numbers SANDOZ-AMIO-PBR3-010178 to SANDOZ-AMIO-PBR3-013671 and FUTURESCRIPTS00001 to FUTURESCRIPTS00005) by no later than May 10, 2019.1 Defendant may file a rebuttal report by no later than May 24, 2019. The parties may depose the experts who submit such reports. 4) All expert discovery shall be completed by no later than June 28, 2019. 5) All other deadlines in the Fifth Scheduling Order (ECF No. 117) shall remain in place. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. See ECF No. 119-1. If Plaintiffs submit such a report, Plaintiffs must heed the directions stated in Section III.B of the memorandum accompanying this Order. 1 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?