COLON v. COLVIN

Filing 15

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED, AND THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY IS REVERSED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER FOR FU RTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS REMAND ONLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOHN R. PADOVA ON 4/19/2017. 4/19/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(amas)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MELINDA COLON, o/b/o E.M.C., a minor child v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL,1 Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2748 ORDER AND NOW, this 19th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review (Docket No. 8), Defendant’s Response thereto, Plaintiff’s Reply Brief, and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Reuter (Docket No. 13), to which no objections have been filed, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff=s Request for Review is GRANTED, and the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is REVERSED to the extent that the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ' 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with the Magistrate Judge=s Report. 3. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff, reversing the decision of the Commissioner for the purpose of this remand only. BY THE COURT: /s/ John R. Padova, J. John R. Padova, J. 1 Nancy A. Berryhill has replaced Carolyn W. Colvin as the Acting Commissioner of Social Security. Accordingly, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d), we substitute Berryhill as the named Defendant in this action.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?