GILYARD et al v. DUSAK et al

Filing 149

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS GRANTED AND WE DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS UNDER THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS AS WELL AS ANY CLAIMS FOR MONELL SUPERVISORY LIABILITY AGAINST THE CITY BASED ON ANY THEORY OTHER THAN CHALLENGING THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE'S POLICY, TRAINING AND SUPERVISING OF OFFICERS' OBLIGATIONSTO INCLUDE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IN AFFIDAVITS OF PROBABLE CAUSE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/8/18. 5/9/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EUGENE GILYARD, et al CIVIL ACTION v. NO. 16-2986 DETECTIVE DENNIS DUSAK, et al ORDER AND NOW, this gth day of May 2018, upon considering Defendants' Motion for partial judgment on the pleadings (ECF Doc. No. 113), Plaintiffs' Oppositions (ECF Doc. Nos. 140, 141), Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 142), following oral argument and for reasons in the accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 113) for partial judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED and we dismiss Plaintiffs' claims under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments as well as any claims for Monell supervisory liability against the City based on any theory other than challenging the Philadelphia Police's policy, training and supervising of officers' obligations to include exculpatory evidence in affidavits of probable cause.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?