GILYARD et al v. DUSAK et al
Filing
149
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IS GRANTED AND WE DISMISS PLAINTIFFS' CLAIMS UNDER THE FIFTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS AS WELL AS ANY CLAIMS FOR MONELL SUPERVISORY LIABILITY AGAINST THE CITY BASED ON ANY THEORY OTHER THAN CHALLENGING THE PHILADELPHIA POLICE'S POLICY, TRAINING AND SUPERVISING OF OFFICERS' OBLIGATIONSTO INCLUDE EXCULPATORY EVIDENCE IN AFFIDAVITS OF PROBABLE CAUSE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 5/8/18. 5/9/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
EUGENE GILYARD, et al
CIVIL ACTION
v.
NO. 16-2986
DETECTIVE DENNIS DUSAK, et al
ORDER
AND NOW, this
gth
day of May 2018, upon considering Defendants' Motion for partial
judgment on the pleadings (ECF Doc. No. 113), Plaintiffs' Oppositions (ECF Doc. Nos. 140, 141),
Defendants' Reply (ECF Doc. No. 142), following oral argument and for reasons in the
accompanying memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendants' Motion (ECF Doc. No. 113) for
partial judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED and we dismiss Plaintiffs' claims under the Fifth
and Fourteenth Amendments as well as any claims for Monell supervisory liability against the City
based on any theory other than challenging the Philadelphia Police's policy, training and
supervising of officers' obligations to include exculpatory evidence in affidavits of probable
cause.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?