VANDEGRIFT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS AMENDED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. 31 ) IS DENIED AS THERE ARE GENUINE ISSUES OF MATERIAL FACT REQUIRING OUR JURY'S EVALUATING WITNESS CREDIBILITY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 1/11/2017. 1/11/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
AND NOW, this 11th day of January 2017, upon consideration of Defendant's Amended
Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF Doc. No. 31), Plaintiffs Response (ECF Doc. No. 36),
Defendant's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 43), and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it
is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 31) is DENIED as there are genuine issues
of material fact requiring our jury's evaluating witness credibility.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?