BROWN v. CHESTER COUNTY PRISON et al
ORDER THAT THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED; IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, JUDGMENT IS HEREBY ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE DEFENDANT AND AGAINST THE PLAINTIFF AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES AS OUTLINED. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 10/19/17. 10/20/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PLAINTIFF AND EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
DONALD P. BROWN, SR.,
AND NOW, this 19th day of October 2017, upon consideration of the defendant’s
motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 35), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
2. In accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, judgment
is hereby ENTERED in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case CLOSED for all purposes.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant’s motion to compel (Doc. No. 37)
is DENIED as moot, and the plaintiff’s requests for counsel and request for an extension
of time to obtain counsel (Doc. Nos. 33, 36, and 39) are DENIED as moot, not only as of
this ruling but also because Mr. Brown remained on the Prisoner Civil Rights Panel as of
his July 5, 2017 and Sept. 13, 2017 requests (Doc. Nos. 33, 36) and for four months total.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, C.J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?