JONES v. GARMIN et al

Filing 28

ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS AND REVISED OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 3/8/18. 3/8/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KAREEM JONES, SR. : : : : : : : : : v. GARMIN, ANTHONY VOCCI, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ________, and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-3099 ORDER NOW, this 8th day of March, 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, petitioner’s Supplemental Brief (Document No. 18), the Report and Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells (Document No. 13), the petitioner=s objections (Document No. 24), and his revised objections (Document No. 27) to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that: 1. The petitioner=s objections and revised objections are OVERRULED; 2. The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 3. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and, 4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability. /s/TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?