JONES v. GARMIN et al
Filing
28
ORDER THAT THE PETITIONER'S OBJECTIONS AND REVISED OBJECTIONS ARE OVERRULED; THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE ON 3/8/18. 3/8/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (jpd )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
KAREEM JONES, SR.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
GARMIN, ANTHONY VOCCI, THE
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE
STATE OF ________, and THE
DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF
PHILADELPHIA
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-3099
ORDER
NOW, this 8th day of March, 2018, upon consideration of the Petition for Writ of
Habeas Corpus (Document No. 1), the response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas
Corpus, petitioner’s Supplemental Brief (Document No. 18), the Report and
Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells
(Document No. 13), the petitioner=s objections (Document No. 24), and his revised
objections (Document No. 27) to the Report and Recommendation, and after a thorough
and independent review of the record, it is ORDERED that:
1.
The petitioner=s objections and revised objections are OVERRULED;
2.
The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore
Wells is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
3.
The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED; and,
4.
There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
/s/TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?