PARKER v. DELANNEY et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DOC. NO. 9) IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; PARKER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (DOC. NO. 1) IS DENIED; THERE HAS BEEN NO SUBSTANTIAL SHOWING OF THE DENIAL OF A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT WARRRANTING THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY; AND THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JUAN R. SANCHEZ ON 5/23/17. 5/23/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
BRENDA TRITT, et al.
AND NOW, this 23rd day of May, 2017, upon careful and independent consideration of
Petitioner Jason Parker’s pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
Jacob P. Hart, to which no objections have been filed, 1 it is ORDERED:
The Report and Recommendation (Document 9) is APPROVED and ADOPTED;
Parker’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Document 1) is DENIED;
There has been no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right warranting
the issuance of a certificate of appealability; and
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Juan R. Sánchez s
Juan R. Sánchez, J.
The Report and Recommendation was sent to all parties of record on February 27, 2017.
Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 72.1 IV(b), a party may object to a magistrate judge’s report
“within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof.” As of today’s date, no
objections have been filed.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?