TOWNS v. PHILADELPHIA CORRECTIONS OFFICERS UNKNOWN et al
Filing
30
ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 23 ) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS ONLY IF HE CAN DO SO IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/11/18. 1/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(mas, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
AKENSHAI TOWNS,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-3584
v.
WARDEN PHILA DETENTION CENTER,
PHILA PRISON CORRECTIONS OFFICER
WILSON, PHILA PRISON CORRECTIONS
OFFICER JACOBSON and COMMISSIONER
MICHAEL R. RESNICK, et al,
Defendants.
ORDER
AND NOW, this
10th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, and Plaintiff’s failure to respond
thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended
Complaint (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without
prejudice; and
3. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days only
if he can do so in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl
Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?