TOWNS v. PHILADELPHIA CORRECTIONS OFFICERS UNKNOWN et al

Filing 30

ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 23 ) IS GRANTED; PLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND PLAINTIFF MAY FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS ONLY IF HE CAN DO SO IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JEFFREY L. SCHMEHL ON 1/11/18. 1/10/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE, E-MAILED.(mas, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AKENSHAI TOWNS, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-3584 v. WARDEN PHILA DETENTION CENTER, PHILA PRISON CORRECTIONS OFFICER WILSON, PHILA PRISON CORRECTIONS OFFICER JACOBSON and COMMISSIONER MICHAEL R. RESNICK, et al, Defendants. ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2018, upon consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint, and Plaintiff’s failure to respond thereto, it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (Docket No. 23) is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice; and 3. Plaintiff may file an Amended Complaint within thirty (30) days only if he can do so in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. BY THE COURT: /s/ Jeffrey L. Schmehl Jeffrey L. Schmehl, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?