THORPE v. COLVIN

Filing 15

ORDER THAT REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED & ADOPTED. PLFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED, & THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IS REVERSED TO THE EXTENT THAT THE MATTER IS REMANDED TO THE COMMISSIONER UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. SEC. 405(g) FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE THOMAS J. RUETER'S REPORT & RECOMMENDATION. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF PLFF, REVERSING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR THE PURPOSE OF THIS REMAND ONLY. SIGNED BY HONORABLE WENDY BEETLESTONE ON 3/6/17. 3/7/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DARRYL A. THORPE CIVIL ACTION v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, 1 Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration NO. 16-3615 ORDER AND NOW, this t . y of Mo-u~, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review, defendant's Response to Request for Review of Plaintiff, and plaintiffs reply thereto, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, it is hereby ORDERED 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiffs Request for Review is GRANTED, and the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration is REVERSED to the extent that the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. ยง 405(g) for further proceedings consistent with United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter's Report and Recommendation. On January 23, 2017, Nancy A. Berryhill became the Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. Pursuant to Rule 25(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Nancy A. Berryhill should be substituted as the defendant in this case. 3. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff, reversing the decision of the Commissioner for the purpose of this remand only, WENDY BEETLESTONE, 2 J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?