WAGNER v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al

Filing 26

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINE HERETO. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 12/13/16. 12/13/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL AND COPY TO LEGAL.(jaa, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROSE WAGNER v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. et al. : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-3623 ORDER AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2016, upon consideration of a partial motion to dismiss and a partial motion for summary judgment from Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Dkt. No. 18, plaintiff Rose Wagner’s response, Dkt. No. 20, and defendants’ reply, Dkt. No. 24, it is ORDERED that defendant’s motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows: 1. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED with respect to Count V of plaintiff’s complaint. Count V is DISMISSED. 2. Defendant’s motion is GRANTED with respect to Count VIII of plaintiff’s complaint. Count VIII is DISMISSED. 3. Defendant’s motion is DENIED in all other respects without prejudice to defendant’s filing a subsequent motion for summary judgment on Counts I–IV and V after further discovery relevant to the preclusive effect of her insurer’s release. If the parties believe a settlement conference would be productive they should contact my chambers (215-597-2750) promptly. s/Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr. THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?