JOHNSON v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
MEORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS (DOC. 4) IS GRANTED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIM UNDER BOTH COUNTS I AND II THAT SHE WAS DISCRIMINATORILY DENIED THE DIRECTOR OF TRAINING POSITION. DEFENDANTS MOTION IS DENIED WITH RESPECT TO PLAINITFFS CLAIM UNDER BOTH COUNTS I AND II THAT SHE WAS DISCRIMINATORILY DENIED THE INTERNAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT PROMOTION. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MICHAEL M. BAYLSON ON 12/7/16. 12/9/16 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED.(rf, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
And NOW, this 7th day of December 2016, for the reasons stated in the foregoing memorandum,
upon consideration of Defendant City of Philadelphia’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 4), and
Plaintiff’s response thereto (ECF No. 7), it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff’s claim under both Counts I
and II that she was discriminatorily denied the Director of Training position.
2. Defendant’s Motion is DENIED with respect to Plaintiff’s claim under both Counts I and
II that she was discriminatorily denied the Internal Affairs Department promotion.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Michael M. Baylson
Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.
O:\CIVIL 16\16-3651 Johnson v Phila\Order re MTD.docx
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?