EMMELL v. PHOENIXVILLE HOSPITAL et al

Filing 47

ORDER THAT DEFT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION (DOC. NO. 44) IS GRANTED IN PART & DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINED HEREIN, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 8/6/18. 8/6/18 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kw, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
LAUREN EMMELL,
Plaintiff,
v.

PHOENIXVILLE HOSPITAL
COMPANY, LLC,
Defendant.

:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 16-3787

ORDER
AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2018, upon careful consideration of
the defendant’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. No. 44) and the plaintiff’s
response (Doc. No. 45), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant’s motion
is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows. This does not alter my
March 29, 2018 decision granting in part and denying in part summary judgment.
1. The defendant’s motion is GRANTED as to the defendant’s argument
regarding pretext. However, even after conducting this additional
analysis in the memorandum that accompanies this order, the conclusion
of my March 29, 2018 summary judgment decision remains in effect.
2. The defendant’s motion is DENIED as to all other issues.
BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.