WORTH v. WORTH et al

Filing 62

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY WE SHOULD NOT ENTER CONTEMPT OR OTHERWISE STAY PARALLEL IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/22/16. 12/23/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CIVIL ACTION

MARKWORTH

v.

NO. 16-3877

STEPHEN WORTH, et al.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 2ih day of December 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion
for an Order to show cause as to why we should not enter contempt or otherwise stay parallel
arbitration proceedings (ECF Doc. No. 57), Defendant Stephen Worth's Opposition and CrossMotion to compel arbitration (ECF Doc. No. 59), Plaintiffs Response (ECF Doc. No. 60) and
for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
1.

Plaintiffs Motion (ECF Doc. No. 58) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in

part as Plaintiffs request for contempt is DENIED but his request to stay the Defendants' postappeal arbitration demand is GRANTED and all future steps in the post-appeal arbitration
demand are STAYED; and,
2.

Defendant's Cross-Motion to compel arbitration (ECF Doc. No. 59) is DENIED.