WORTH v. WORTH et al
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS TO WHY WE SHOULD NOT ENTER CONTEMPT OR OTHERWISE STAY PARALLEL IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION IS DENIED; ETC.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 12/22/16. 12/23/16 ENTERED AND E-MAILED.(jl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
STEPHEN WORTH, et al.
AND NOW, this 2ih day of December 2016, upon consideration of Plaintiffs Motion
for an Order to show cause as to why we should not enter contempt or otherwise stay parallel
arbitration proceedings (ECF Doc. No. 57), Defendant Stephen Worth's Opposition and CrossMotion to compel arbitration (ECF Doc. No. 59), Plaintiffs Response (ECF Doc. No. 60) and
for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED:
Plaintiffs Motion (ECF Doc. No. 58) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in
part as Plaintiffs request for contempt is DENIED but his request to stay the Defendants' postappeal arbitration demand is GRANTED and all future steps in the post-appeal arbitration
demand are STAYED; and,
Defendant's Cross-Motion to compel arbitration (ECF Doc. No. 59) is DENIED.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?