JACKSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 57

ORDER THAT MOVING DEFTS' MOTION TO DISMISS IS GRANTED; PLFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ONLY AS TO DEFT. JOHNSON; PLFF'S THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT IS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE AS TO DEFTS. MURRAY, MOONEY, AND ALL REMAINING PREVIOUSLY NAMED DEFTS.; AND PLFF. IS PERMITTED TO SEEK LEAVE TO FILE A FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS OF THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE C. DARNELL JONES, II ON 2/22/19. 2/22/19 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

Download PDF
I~ THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COCRT FOR THE EASTER.~ DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DANTE JACKSON, Plaintiff V. F\LED FEB 2 L :20\9 Civil Action No. 16-3892 KATE BARKM~~~~rk CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.~Y---Defendants. ORDER AND :SOW, this)) 1-ay of February, 2019, upon consideration of: Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint (ECF No. 27), Defendants Murray, Mooney, and Johnson (Moving Defendants)'s Motion to Dismiss (ECF ;\O. 41 ), and Plaintiffs Response in Opposition (ECF No. 44), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: (1) Moving Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; (2) Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE ONLY AS TO Defendant Johnson; (3) Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOuT PREJuDICE AS TO Defendants Murray, Mooney, and all remaining previously named defendants; and, (4) Plaintiff is PERMITTED TO SEEK LEAVE to file a Fourth Amended Complaint within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order. Any such motion shall remedy only the deficiencies discussed in the accompanying memorandum. Failure by Plaintiff to seek leave to amend shall result in dismissal with prejudice as to all Moving Defendants here, and reinstatement of Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint as to all remaining previously named defendants. BY THE COURT: J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?