OREN v. HARRY et al

Filing 11

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 12/20/16. 12/21/16 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ARIE OREN
Petitioner,
v.
SUPERINTENDENT LAUREL HARRY, et al.,
Respondents.

:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 16-3896

ORDER
AND NOW, this 20th day of December 2016, after careful and independent consideration
of Arie Oren’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State
Custody (Doc. No. 1), and review of the Report and Recommendation by United States Chief
Magistrate Judge Linda K. Caracappa (Doc. No. 10), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3. A certificate of appealability shall not issue because reasonable jurists would not
debate the correctness of this Court’s ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Legrome D. Davis
Legrome D. Davis, J.