CAMPBELL v. PATRICT et al
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 1/5/17. 1/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
GEORGE PATRICT, et al.
AND NOW, this 5th day of January 2017, after careful and independent consideration of
James Campbell’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in
State Custody (Doc. No. 1), the Respondent’s Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(Doc. No. 8), and review of the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge
Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 9), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3. A certificate of appealability shall not issue because reasonable jurists would not
debate the correctness of this Court’s ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Legrome D. Davis
Legrome D. Davis, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?