CAMPBELL v. PATRICT et al

Filing 11

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE LEGROME D. DAVIS ON 1/5/17. 1/6/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JAMES CAMPBELL
v.
GEORGE PATRICT, et al.

:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 16-cv-4021

ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of January 2017, after careful and independent consideration of
James Campbell’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in
State Custody (Doc. No. 1), the Respondent’s Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(Doc. No. 8), and review of the Report and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge
Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 9), it is ORDERED as follows:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
3. A certificate of appealability shall not issue because reasonable jurists would not
debate the correctness of this Court’s ruling. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v.
McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000).
4. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:
/s/ Legrome D. Davis
Legrome D. Davis, J.