WUGNET PUBLICATIONS, INC. v. PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY

Filing 17

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF (1) DEFENDANT PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DKT. NO. 10 , PLAINTIFF WUGNET PUBLICATIONS, INC.'S RESPONSE, DKT. NO. 13 , AND DEFENDANT'S REPLY BRIEF, DKT. NO. 14 ; AND (2) PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DKT. NO. 11 , DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE, DKT. NO. 12 , AND PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF, DKT. NO. 14 , IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION, DKT. NO. 10 , IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFF'S CROSS-MOTION, DKT. NO. 11 , IS DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF ON ALL COUNTS OF THE COMPLAINT. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE THOMAS N. ONEILL, JR ON 6/27/17. 6/27/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WUGNET PUBLICATIONS, INC. c/o JOEL DIAMOND v. PEERLESS INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY, a division of OHIO CASUALTY, a member of the Liberty Mutual Group : : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4044 ORDER AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2017, upon consideration of (1) defendant Peerless Indemnity Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment, Dkt. No. 10, plaintiff Wugnet Publications, Inc.’s response, Dkt. No. 13, and defendant’s reply brief, Dkt. No. 14; and (2) plaintiff’s cross-motion for partial summary judgment, Dkt. No. 11, defendant’s response, Dkt. No. 12, and plaintiff’s reply brief, Dkt. No. 14, it is ORDERED that defendant’s motion, Dkt. No. 10, is GRANTED and plaintiff’s cross-motion, Dkt. No. 11, is DENIED. JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of defendant and against plaintiff on all counts of the complaint. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED. /s/ Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr. THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?