PERUTO v. SANTANDER BANK, N.A. et al
ORDERED THAT SANTANDER'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOCKET NO. 14) IS GRANTED. MERIDIAN'S MOTION TO DISMISS (DOCKET NO. 6) IS GRANTED. PLAINLTIFF'S COMPLAINT (DOCKET NO. 1) IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL MARK THIS CASE CLOSED FOR ALL PURPOSES INCLUDING STATISTICS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 10/24/16. 10/24/16 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(rab, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
A. CHARLES PERUTO, JR.
SANTANDER BANK, N.A. and
MERIDIAN CAPITAL GROUP, LLC,
AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2016, upon consideration of Santander Bank,
N.A.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 14), Plaintiff’s Response in
Opposition (Docket No. 18), Meridian Capital Group, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6),
Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Docket No. 17), and after an oral argument on these Motions
held on October 13, 2016, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Santander’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Docket No. 14) is GRANTED.
2. Meridian’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6) is GRANTED.
3. Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docket No. 1) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for all purposes including statistics.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?