SEITZ et al v. EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP et al

Filing 33

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 24 25 ARE DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS' SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAIM BASED ON THE SEIZURE OF THEIR PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND GRANTED AS TO ALL OTHER CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 5/24/17. 5/24/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN R. SEITZ, III, and HICKORY HILL GROUP, LLC, Plaintiffs, v. EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION No. 16-4130 ORDER This 24th day of May, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. 24 and Dkt. 25), and the Responses and Replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions are DENIED as to Plaintiffs’ substantive due process claim based on the seizure of their private driveway and GRANTED as to all other claims. /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?