SEITZ et al v. EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP et al
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER THAT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS 24 25 ARE DENIED AS TO PLAINTIFFS' SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS CLAIM BASED ON THE SEIZURE OF THEIR PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND GRANTED AS TO ALL OTHER CLAIMS. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD A. MCHUGH ON 5/24/17. 5/24/17 ENTERED & E-MAILED.(fdc)
<![CDATA[
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
JOHN R. SEITZ, III, and
HICKORY HILL GROUP, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
EAST NOTTINGHAM TOWNSHIP et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
No. 16-4130
ORDER
This 24th day of May, upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint, Defendants’
Motions to Dismiss (Dkt. 24 and Dkt. 25), and the Responses and Replies thereto, it is hereby
ORDERED that Defendants’ Motions are DENIED as to Plaintiffs’ substantive due process
claim based on the seizure of their private driveway and GRANTED as to all other claims.
/s/ Gerald Austin McHugh
United States District Judge
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
