ROBINSON v. MOONEY et al

Filing 24

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED WITH PREJUDICE AND DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING; AND THERE IS NO PROBABLE CAUSE TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY.. SIGNED BY CHIEF JUDGE LAWRENCE F. STENGEL ON 7/16/18. 7/17/18 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER, E-MAILED TO COUNSEL.(pr, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CARL ROBINSON,
Petitioner
vs.
VINCENT MOONEY, et al.,
Respondents

:
:
:
:
:
:
:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 16-4224

ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2018, upon independent consideration of the
petition for writ of habeas corpus, the response and supplemental response to the petition
(Documents #12 and 16), and after careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin, there
being no objections thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice and
DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and
3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel
LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, C. J.