KREMSKY v. KREMSKY

Filing 65

ORDER THAT UPON CONSIDERATION OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE BRAD RYDEN'S TESTIMONY BASED UPON HIS 12/30/2016 DISCLOSURES UNDER DAUBERT 38 , IT IS ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION IS GRANTED IN PART, ETC. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 2/17/17. 2/17/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(ti, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STANTON S. KREMSKY v. CIVIL ACTION N0.16-4474 KENNETH F. KREMSKY ORDER AND NOW, this 17th day of February 2017, upon consideration of Defendant's Motion in limine to preclude Brad Ryden's testimony based upon his December 30, 2016 disclosures under Daubert (ECF Doc. No. 38), Plaintiffs Response (ECF Doc. No. 55) and for reasons in the accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED Defendant's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 38) is GRANTED in part and Plaintiff may not adduce testimony from Brad Ryden as to Defendant's motives, "Fraud Triangle" or partial calculations but Mr. Ryden may read from financial records described in his December 30, 2016 disclosures subject to cross examination without opining as to their import or affect upon Plaintiffs claims against Defendant. ~ KE~J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?