BUGLAK v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.
Filing
52
ORDER THAT THE MOTION (DOC NO. 39) IS GRANTED. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' UNTIMELY RESPONSE IS DENIED AS MOOT. SIGNED BY HONORABLE BERLE M. SCHILLER ON 7/21/17. 7/21/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(mbh, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBERT BUGLAK, JR.,
Individually and on behalf of other
employees similarly situated
Plaintiffs,
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A.,
Defendant.
CIVIL ACTION
No. 16-4546
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of July, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for
Partial Summary Judgment, and for the reasons set forth in this Court’s July 21, 2017,
memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1.
The motion (Document No. 39) is GRANTED.
2.
Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Untimely Response (Document No. 48)
is DENIED as moot.
BY THE COURT:
Berle M. Schiller, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?