PANITCH et al v. THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY
Filing
22
ORDER THAT THE MOTION (DOC. NO. 5) IS GRANTED FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM (DOC. NO. 21). THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL TRANSFER THIS CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, AND SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE PAUL S. DIAMOND ON 4/5/17. 4/5/17 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED TO COUNSEL AND 1 COPY TO LEGAL BIN.(nl, ) Modified on 4/5/2017 (nl, ).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
OREN PANITCH, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE QUAKER OATS COMPANY,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Civ. No. 16-4586
ORDER
AND NOW, this 5th day of April, 2017, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to
Transfer or Stay (Doc. No. 5), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant’s
Motion to Transfer or Stay (Doc. No. 9), Defendant’s Notice of Supplemental Authority (Doc.
No. 14), Defendant’s Reply in Support of Motion to Transfer or Stay (Doc. No. 19), Plaintiffs’
Sur-Reply in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Transfer or Stay (Doc. No. 20), and all related
submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. No. 5) is GRANTED for the
reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum (Doc. No. 21). The CLERK OF COURT
shall TRANSFER this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of
Illinois, and shall CLOSE this case.
AND IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Paul S. Diamond
_______________________
Paul S. Diamond, J.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?