WILLIAMS v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al

Filing 33

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 29 IS GRANTED AND PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT 3 IS DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO MARK THIS CASE CLOSED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE EDUARDO C. ROBRENO ON 07/10/2017. 07/10/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PLAINTIFF AND E-MAILED.(nds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA EUGENE WILLIAMS : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, et al., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4595 O R D E R AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 3), Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 23), and Defendant’s Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 30), it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 29) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 3) is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to mark the case as CLOSED. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Eduardo C. Robreno EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?