WILLIAMS v. NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S FEE PETITION (DOC. 15 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A JOINT MOTION FOR THE APPROVAL SETTLEMENT ON OR BEFORE 8/15/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/9/2017. 8/9/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHRISTOPHER G. WILLIAMS,
individually and on behalf of all others
NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES
AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Fee
Petition, (ECF No. 15), the Defendant’s Response, (ECF No. 16), Plaintiff’s Reply, (ECF
No. 18), and after holding oral argument on July 20, 2017, (ECF No. 21), it is
ORDERED that the Petition is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent
with the accompanying Memorandum. The parties SHALL FILE a joint motion for the
approval of settlement on or before August 15, 2017.5
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Gerald J. Pappert
GERALD J. PAPPERT, J.
In preparing their joint settlement proposal, the parties should consult the Court’s previous
decisions in Rubbo v. PeopleScout, Inc., No. 16-4903, 2017 WL 2010311 (E.D. Pa. May 11, 2017) and
Nwogwugwu v. Spring Meadows at Lansdale, Inc., No. 16-2663, 2017 WL 2215264 (E.D. Pa. May, 18,
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?