WILLIAMS v. NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION

Filing 24

ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF'S FEE PETITION (DOC. 15 ) IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART CONSISTENT WITH THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM. THE PARTIES SHALL FILE A JOINT MOTION FOR THE APPROVAL SETTLEMENT ON OR BEFORE 8/15/2017. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GERALD J. PAPPERT ON 8/9/2017. 8/9/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(sg, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CHRISTOPHER G. WILLIAMS, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-4639 Plaintiff, v. NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION, Defendant. ORDER AND NOW, this 9th day of August, 2017, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Fee Petition, (ECF No. 15), the Defendant’s Response, (ECF No. 16), Plaintiff’s Reply, (ECF No. 18), and after holding oral argument on July 20, 2017, (ECF No. 21), it is ORDERED that the Petition is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with the accompanying Memorandum. The parties SHALL FILE a joint motion for the approval of settlement on or before August 15, 2017.5 BY THE COURT: /s/ Gerald J. Pappert GERALD J. PAPPERT, J. In preparing their joint settlement proposal, the parties should consult the Court’s previous decisions in Rubbo v. PeopleScout, Inc., No. 16-4903, 2017 WL 2010311 (E.D. Pa. May 11, 2017) and Nwogwugwu v. Spring Meadows at Lansdale, Inc., No. 16-2663, 2017 WL 2215264 (E.D. Pa. May, 18, 2017). 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?