PRO-SPEC CORPORATION v. CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY et al

Filing 71

ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE, AUTHORITY'S REPLY AND FOR REASONS IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/28/17. 6/28/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PRO-SPEC CORPORATION

vs.

CIVIL ACTION

N0.16-4728

CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY, et al.

ORDER
AND NOW, this 281h day of June 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Chester Water

Authority's ("Authority") Motion for partial summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 55), Plaintiffs
Response (ECF Doc. No. 61), Authority's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 66) and for reasons in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Authority's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 55) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:

1.

We grant the Authority's Motion dismissing Plaintiffs civil conspiracy and

unjust enrichment claims against it; and,
2.
it.

We deny the Authority's Motion as to Plaintiffs breach of contract claim against