PRO-SPEC CORPORATION v. CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY et al
ORDER THAT DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE, AUTHORITY'S REPLY AND FOR REASONS IN THE ACCOMPANYING MEMORANDUM IS GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS OUTLINE. SIGNED BY HONORABLE MARK A. KEARNEY ON 6/28/17. 6/28/17 ENTERED AND COPIES EMAILED TO COUNSEL.(jaa, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
CHESTER WATER AUTHORITY, et al.
AND NOW, this 281h day of June 2017, upon consideration of Defendant Chester Water
Authority's ("Authority") Motion for partial summary judgment (ECF Doc. No. 55), Plaintiffs
Response (ECF Doc. No. 61), Authority's Reply (ECF Doc. No. 66) and for reasons in the
accompanying Memorandum, it is ORDERED the Authority's Motion (ECF Doc. No. 55) is
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part:
We grant the Authority's Motion dismissing Plaintiffs civil conspiracy and
unjust enrichment claims against it; and,
We deny the Authority's Motion as to Plaintiffs breach of contract claim against
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?