COLLIER v. COLVIN
Filing
14
ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED. THE PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR REVIEW IS GRANTED IN PART AND THE MATTER IS REMANDED. THE CLERK OF COURT IS DIRECTED TO REMOVE THIS MATTER FROM SUSPENSE AND MARK THE CASE AS CLOSED.. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 6/5/2017. 6/5/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED.(kp, )
Case 2:16-cv-04783-JHS Document 12-1 Filed 05/19/17 Page 1of2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ROBBIN L. COLLIER,
CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,
v.
NO. 16-4783
NANCY A.BERRYHILL, 1
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
FILE·"'1
··,
';').;:
....
JUN 0 5 tGil
Defendant.
BY.KATE BARKMAN ""'"'n:.~IOl I\
"'Vfl·
ORDER
Clem
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.,
AND NOW, thisSJA' day of
::J'(A /\IE
, 2017, upon consideration of the
Plaintiffs Request for Review and the Defendant's Response thereto, and after careful review of
the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.
2. The Plaintiff's Request for Review is GRANTED IN PART, and the matter is
REMANDED, pursuant to the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further review
consistent with the Report and Recommendation.
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to remove this matter from the suspense docket and
On January 23, 2017, Carolyn W. Colvin was succeeded by Nancy A. Berryhill as the
Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. See http://www.lb7.uscourts.gov/
documents/15-1210.pdf (last visited May 15, 2017). Accordingly, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
25(d), she is substituted as the named Defendant in this action.
Case 2:16-cv-04783-JHS Document 12-1 Filed 05/19/17 Page 2 of 2
mark the case as CLOSED.
BY THE COURT:
JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J. (
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?