HENRY v. SMITH et al

Filing 17

ORDER THAT THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED; THE PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IS DENIED; A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILTY SHALL NOT ISSUE; THE CLERK OF COURT SHALL CLOSE THIS CASE FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. SIGNED BY HONORABLE JOEL H. SLOMSKY ON 7/10/17. 7/11/17 ENTERED AND COPIES MAILED TO PRO SE PETITIONER AND E-MAILED. (jpd )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MICHAEL JOSEPH HENRY, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5010 v. BARRY SMITH, et al., Respondents. ORDER AND NOW, this 10th day of July 2017, upon careful consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 3), the Response in Opposition to the Petition (Doc. No. 10), Petitioner’s Reply (Doc. No. 11), the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Marilyn Heffley (Doc. No. 13), and Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 14), it is ORDERED that: 1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 13) is APPROVED and ADOPTED. 2. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED. 3. A Certificate of Appealability SHALL NOT issue because, based on the analysis contained in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, as approved and adopted by this Court, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the Habeas Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000). 4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes. BY THE COURT: / s / J oel H. S l om s k y JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?