WRIGHT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al

Filing 87

ORDER: THAT THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE (DOC. NO. 79) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 8/21/2017. 8/23/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (sme, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ANTHONY WRIGHT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al., Defendants. : : : : : : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-5020 ORDER AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office’s Motion to Enforce (Doc. No. 79), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 80), the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office’s Letter Brief (Doc. No. 84), and after an Oral Argument held on August 9, 2017, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office’s Motion to Enforce (Doc. No. 79) is DENIED. BY THE COURT: S/Gene E.K. Pratter GENE E.K. PRATTER UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?