WRIGHT v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
Filing
87
ORDER: THAT THE PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE'S MOTION TO ENFORCE (DOC. NO. 79) IS DENIED. SIGNED BY HONORABLE GENE E.K. PRATTER ON 8/21/2017. 8/23/2017 ENTERED AND COPIES E-MAILED. (sme, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
ANTHONY WRIGHT,
Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al.,
Defendants.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
CIVIL ACTION
NO. 16-5020
ORDER
AND NOW, this 21st day of August, 2017, upon consideration of the Philadelphia
District Attorney’s Office’s Motion to Enforce (Doc. No. 79), Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition
(Doc. No. 80), the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office’s Letter Brief (Doc. No. 84), and after
an Oral Argument held on August 9, 2017, it is HEREBY ORDERED that the Philadelphia
District Attorney’s Office’s Motion to Enforce (Doc. No. 79) is DENIED.
BY THE COURT:
S/Gene E.K. Pratter
GENE E.K. PRATTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?